Forward error-correction coding
#1


[attachment=5188]


Introduction

The packet transport service provided by representative packet-switched networks, including IP networks, is not reliable and the quality-of-service cannot be guaranteed. Packets may be lost due to buffer overflow in switching nodes, be discarded due to excessive bit errors and failure to pass the cyclic redundancy check at the page link layer, or be discarded by network control mechanisms as a response to congestion somewhere in the network. Forward Error Correction coding has often been proposed for end-to-end recovery from such packet losses. However, the use of FEC in this application provides a double-edged sword. From an end user’s perspective, FEC can help recover the lost packets in a timely fashion through the use of redundant packets, and generally adding more redundancy can be expected to improve performance provided this added redundancy does not adversely affect the network packet loss characteristics. On the other hand, from the network’s perspective, the widespread use of FEC schemes by end nodes will increase the raw packet-loss rate in a network because of the additional loads resulting from transmission of redundant packets. Therefore, in order to optimize the end-to-end performance, the appropriate tradeoff, in terms of the amount of redundancy added, and its effect on network packet-loss processes, needs to be investigated under specific and realistic modeling assumptions.

We provide a study of the overall effectiveness of packet-level FEC coding, employing interlaced Reed-Solomon codes, in combating network packet losses and provide an information- theoretic methodology for determining the optimum compromise between end-to-end performances and the associated increase in raw packet-loss rates using a realistic model-

based analytic approach. Intuitively, for a given choice of block length we expect that there is an optimum choice of redundancy, or channel coding rate, since a rate too high is simply not powerful enough to effectively recover packet losses while a rate too low results in excessive raw packet losses due to the increased overhead which overwhelms the packet recovery capabilities of the FEC code. The optimum channel coding rate results in an optimum compromise between these two effects.

Here we focus on evaluating the capability of FEC in recovering packet losses over IP networks using residual packet-loss rate as the performance measure. In terms of characterizing end-to-end performance, we assume that performance is directly proportional to the source coding rate, or network load, that can be supported for a fixed residual packet-loss rate. The analytic procedure developed is then used to determine the maximum load that can be supported as a function of coding parameters. By modeling the fully interleaved network transport channel as a block interference channel, we provide information theoretic bound on the performance achievable with FEC. This bound provides a useful context for assessing the efficacy of FEC in this application as a function of coding parameters.
Reply
#2

what are the possible mathematical model for FEC
Reply
#3
actually the mathematical model in "gilbert loss model"
i am suggest you to read following pages to know well about Forward error-correction coding
http://en.wikipediawiki/Forward_error_correction
http://books.googlebooks?id=rs-lBlFF_B8C&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=Forward+error+correction+mathematical+model&source=bl&ots=qnqQMEPGQ4&sig=l_QF5meLXIVcmxxd5MCYVgRECT8&hl=en&ei=J803TbOtEsyHcfT88OUK&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Forward%20error%20correction%20mathematical%20model&f=false
Reply

Important Note..!

If you are not satisfied with above reply ,..Please

ASK HERE

So that we will collect data for you and will made reply to the request....OR try below "QUICK REPLY" box to add a reply to this page
Popular Searches: authentication error digsby, error correction test, evaluating the efficacy of forward error correction coding, selection of scheduling vector in error control coding, ports forward pptp, idvd multiplexing error, rasdial error 619,

[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Efficient Broadcasting Using Network Coding and Directional Antennas in MANETs seminar class 1 1,680 16-02-2012, 01:27 PM
Last Post: seminar paper
  On the Security and Efficiency of Content Distribution via Network Coding Projects9 0 889 20-01-2012, 06:16 PM
Last Post: Projects9
  Compiler-Directed Soft Error Mitigation for Embedded Systems Projects9 0 770 20-01-2012, 06:10 PM
Last Post: Projects9
  Color Image Indexing Using Binay Truncation Coding smart paper boy 0 1,379 15-07-2011, 09:46 AM
Last Post: smart paper boy
  PALMPRINT VERIFICATION USING CONSISTENT ORIENTATION CODING smart paper boy 0 1,286 22-06-2011, 02:38 PM
Last Post: smart paper boy
  Towards Optimal Color Image Coding using Demosaicing smart paper boy 0 1,058 20-06-2011, 10:58 AM
Last Post: smart paper boy
  A new steganographic scheme based on vector quantisation and search-order coding seminar class 0 1,084 05-05-2011, 04:49 PM
Last Post: seminar class
  Enhancing Iris Biometric Recognition System with Cryptography and Error Correction seminar class 0 1,517 04-05-2011, 11:29 AM
Last Post: seminar class
  Active Clamp and Reset Technique Enhances Forward Converter Performance seminar class 0 1,198 03-05-2011, 10:36 AM
Last Post: seminar class
  Improving Delay-Tolerant Network Performance Using Forward Routing Information project topics 0 833 02-05-2011, 12:05 PM
Last Post: project topics

Forum Jump: