What is major difference between aodv and dymo..
why we go for dymo instead of aodv
major reason behind
Posts: 6,843
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2015
ABSTRACT
Communication devices have become one of the most important instruments to stay in touch with each other. Over the years, engineers have been working to enhance the network protocols used by these devices for better communication. Dynamic Mobile Ad hoc Network Ondemand (DYMO) routing is one such protocol that is intended for the use by mobile nodes in wireless multihop ad hoc networks. It can adapt to the changing network topology and determine unicast routes between nodes within the network. In this paper, we have compared the Dynamic Mobile Ad hoc Network On-demand routing protocol with existing routing protocols. We use the implementation based on the specification given inDynamic Mobile Ad hoc Network On-demand Internet Engineering Task Force to (a) Evaluate the protocol with respect to various quantitative performance metrics like itter, throughput and delay. (b) To compare this with existing Ad hoc routing protocols. Our findings reveal that DYMO and Ad hoc on Demand Distance Vector (AODV) tend to have a higher packet delivery ratio whereas the jitter experienced by Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) is the highest. Also, the throughput of DYMO, AODV, Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and DSDV was found to be closer to each other, but the effect of jitter on throughput in DYMO is much lesser than other protocols. The delay experienced by DYMO is the lowest at 0.0278s. This paper is intended for audience having prior knowledge about network routing protocols and its related quantitative performance metrics