LOCALIZED SENSOR AREA COVERAGE WITH LOW COMMUNICATION OVERHEAD -MOBILE COMPUTING
#1

LOCALIZED SENSOR AREA COVERAGE WITH LOW COMMUNICATION OVERHEAD -MOBILE COMPUTING


We propose several localized sensor area coverage protocols for heterogeneous sensors, each with arbitrary sensing and transmission radii. Each sensor has a time out period and listens to messages sent by respective nodes before the time out expires. Sensor nodes whose sensing area is not fully covered (or fully covered but with a disconnected set of active sensors) when the deadline expires decide to remain active for the considered round and transmit an activity message announcing it. In our approach, sensor decides to sleep only if neighbor sensor is active or not covered. Covered nodes decide to sleep, with or without transmitting a withdrawal message to inform neighbors about the status. After hearing from more neighbors, inactive sensors may observe that they became covered and may decide to alter their original decision and transmit a retreat message.
Technology to use:.NET
Reply
#2
for more information please check it out these pages
http://wireless.kth.se/adhoc05/submissio...emovic.pdf
http://site.uottawa.ca/~ivan/sensor-area.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/sum...1.118.3843
Reply
#3
[attachment=5147]
Localized Sensor Area Coverage with Low Communication Overhead


Abstract
We propose several localized sensor area coverage protocols for heterogeneous sensors, each with arbitrary sensing and transmission radii. Each sensor have a time out period and listens to messages sent by respective nodes before the time out expires. Sensor nodes whose sensing area is not fully covered (or fully covered but with a disconnected set of active sensors) when the deadline expires decide to remain active for the considered round and transmit an activity message announcing it. In our approach, sensor decides to sleep only if neighbor sensor is active or not covered. Covered nodes decide to sleep, with or without transmitting a withdrawal message to inform neighbors about the status. After hearing from more neighbors, inactive sensors may observe that they became covered and may decide to alter their original decision and transmit a retreat message.



Reply
#4
Shocked 
[attachment=6045]
Communication Coverage
in Wireless
Passive Sensor Networks


Abstract


System lifetime of wireless sensor networks (WSN) is inversely proportional to the energy consumed by critically energy-constrained sensor nodes during RF transmission.
Hence, wireless passive sensor networks (WPSN) designed to operate using MB do not have the lifetime constraints of conventional WSN.
However, the communication performance of WPSN is directly related to the RF coverage provided over the field the passive sensor nodes are deployed.

INTRODUCTION


WIRELESS sensor networks (WSN) are, in general, composed of low-cost, low-power sensor nodes which can only be equipped with a limited power source, i.e., a battery.
With MB approach, a passive sensor node transmits its data simply by modulating the incident signal from an RF source by switching its antenna impedance.
Therefore, the transmitter is basically an antenna impedance switching circuitry, and WPSN is free of the lifetime constraint of conventional WSN.
The main focus of this paper is to investigate the communication coverage problem in WPSN.
WPSN MODEL


The source of energy is an RF power source which is assumed to have unlimited power.
The source transmits RF power to run the passive nodes, and it transmits and receives information from WPSN nodes simultaneously.
A typical WPSN node hardware is represented in Fig.
In the WPSN node, however, the power generator, which is an RFto-DC converter , is an inherent part of the power unit and is the unique power source of the sensor node.
Required power is obtained from the incident RF signal inducing a voltage on the receiver WPSN node.
Reply
#5
[attachment=7133]
Communication Coverage in Wireless Passive Sensor Networks


Alper Bereketli, Student Member, IEEE, and Ozgur B. Akan, Senior Member, IEEE


Abstract—

System lifetime of wireless sensor networks (WSN) is inversely proportional to the energy consumed by critically energy-constrained sensor nodes during RF transmission. In that regard, modulated backscattering (MB) is a promising design choice, in which sensor nodes send their data just by switching their antenna impedance and reflecting the incident signal coming from an RF source. Hence, wireless passive sensor networks (WPSN) designed to operate using MB do not have the lifetime constraints of conventional WSN. However, the communication performance of WPSN is directly related to the RF coverage provided over the field the passive sensor nodes are deployed. In this letter, RF communication coverage in WPSN is analytically investigated. The required number of RF sources to obtain interference-free communication connectivity with the WPSN nodes is determined and analyzed in terms of output power and the transmission frequency of RF sources, network size, RF source and WPSN node characteristics.
Reply
#6

plz send full details on modulated backscattering
Reply

Important Note..!

If you are not satisfied with above reply ,..Please

ASK HERE

So that we will collect data for you and will made reply to the request....OR try below "QUICK REPLY" box to add a reply to this page
Popular Searches: dab coverage, 3m 1830 overhead, cdma coverage, iridium satellite coverage, overhead projector rental long island, seminar topics related with overhead lines, wi5 coverage,

[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Platform Autonomous Custom Scalable Service using Service Oriented Cloud Computing Ar 1 1,057 15-02-2017, 04:39 PM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  Privacy- and Integrity-Preserving Range Queries in Sensor Networks 1 870 15-02-2017, 04:10 PM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  Cloud Computing with Service Oriented Architecture in Business Applications 1 916 15-02-2017, 11:55 AM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  Protecting Location Privacy in Sensor Networks Against a Global Eavesdropper 1 807 15-02-2017, 11:01 AM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  Protecting Location Privacy in Sensor Networks Against a Global Eavesdropper 1 776 15-02-2017, 11:00 AM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  Cloud Computing Security: From Single to Multi-Clouds 1 835 14-02-2017, 04:56 PM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  SPOC: A Secure and Privacy-preserving Opportunistic Computing Framework for Mobile-He 1 914 14-02-2017, 03:49 PM
Last Post: jaseela123d
  MOBILE PHONE BASED ATTENDANCE TRACKING SYSTEM seminarsonly 25 21,071 06-03-2015, 07:18 PM
Last Post: unas
  projects on cloud computing? shakir_ali 0 1,218 30-10-2014, 01:12 AM
Last Post: shakir_ali
  Mobile shop management System computer science technology 7 14,788 01-07-2014, 06:21 PM
Last Post: seminar report asees

Forum Jump: