kindly provide me chhattisgarh factories rules 1962 pdf
file soon

thanks and regards

(1) After selecting the site for setting
up industrial undertaking an investor shall, in consultation with the
appropriate nodal agency, apply to the appropriate nodal agency for
obtaining the clearances required for proposed investment under
various laws, rules, regulations, bye-laws, etc.
(2) An investor seeking clearances for establishment of industrial
undertaking shall apply in a Common Application Form which shall
comprise of Form-I and the forms given in Table -2 and Table-3.
(3) Printed copies of the Common Application Form shall be made
available by the nodal agency on request to the investor on payment of
such fees as may be notified by the State Government from time to time.
(4) If any clearance is not covered by the Common Application Form,
the investor shall submit an additional application in the form prescribed
under the relevant laws for such clearance.
(5) The Common Application Form and the additional application form, if
any, along with fee receipts, enclosures, certificates, and check lists shall
be duly completed and signed by the investor.
(6) The Common Application Form and the additional application form, if
any, duly filled in, shall be submitted in required number of copies to the
District level or the State level nodal agency, as the case may be.
(7) At the time of submission of the Common Application Form and the
additional application form by the investor to the nodal agency, the
authorized representative of the nodal agency shall satisfy
himself/herself that :
(i) the application forms are complete in all respects;
(ii) required number of copies of the application forms have been
submitted; and
(iii) all specified documents have been filled in and enclosed with the
application forms;
and issue acknowledgement in Form-II to the investor as a proof of
receipt of application by the nodal agency.

Procedure for investigation of related party import cases and other cases by the Special Valuation Branches

Procedure for investigation of related party import cases and other cases by the Special Valuation Branches - Customs - 05/2016 - Dated:- 9-2-2016 - CIRCULAR NO 5 /2016-Customs F. No. 465/12/2010-Cus V GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS New Delhi, dated 9th February, 2016 To, All Principal Chief Commissioners Customs All Principal Chie... ...

2015 (10) TMI 2316 - ITAT PUNE

Shree Om Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd., Roopam Steel Rolling Mills and Shivshakti Re-Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd Versus The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range – 1, Aurangabad and vice – versa and The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1 (3) , Jalna. Versus Shivshakti Re-Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.,

Addition made on account of suppressed production / sales of TMT bars on the basis of electricity unit consumption - CIT(A) quantifying the suppressed production @ 4% as against the addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of the total suppressed production, where the assessee was found to be indulging in clandestine removal of goods without payment of Excise duty - Held that:- No extrapolation of sales for 300 days can be made in the ha... ...

2013 (7) TMI 72 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Bharti Airtel Ltd. and others Versus The State of West Bengal and others

Validity of West Bengal Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2012 questioned - whether the purpose for which the proceeds of Entry Tax was sought be spent could be treated as compensatory in nature? - Held that:- Utilization of the proceeds of Entry Tax under the impugned Entry Tax Act for the purpose specified in Sub-clause (g) of creating, developing and maintaining pollution free atmosphere in the concerned areas has remote connection, ... ...

2013 (5) TMI 460 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Union of India Versus , COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS M/s Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Cenvat Credit - Supply to SEZ - Amendment to rule 6 - whether retrospective or prospective - Held that:- The Assessee had supplied goods from the domestic tariff area to a developer and it is to be treated as an export in view of sub-section 2(m) of the SEZ Act. In case it is treated to be export then all benefits as given to export under any other law should be given. - Rule 6 of the 2004-Rules is titled 'obligation of a manufacturer of duti... ...

Prescribes effective rate of duty on goods falling under chapter 1 to 96

Prescribes effective rate of duty on goods falling under chapter 1 to 96 - Central Excise - 12/2012 - Dated:- 17-3-2012 - TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) New Delhi, the 17th March, 2012 Notification No. 12/2012-Central Excise G.S.R. 163(E).-In exercise of the powers conferre... ...

Prescribes effective rate of duty on import of goods

Prescribes effective rate of duty on import of goods - Customs - 12/2012 –Customs - Dated:- 17-3-2012 - [TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) New Delhi, dated the 17th March, 2012 Notification No. 12/2012 -Customs G.S.R. 185(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section... ...

2012 (4) TMI 254 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, ALLAHABAD Versus M/s HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD

Modvat Credit on Invoices other than duplicate copies – Revenue stated that respondent-assessee illegally and irregularly availed Modvat credit on Fabricated heaters/Fabricated tubes/Crab Assembly and Refractory materials - on the ground that the words 'duplicate invoice' was not mentioned on invoices and Refractory and Refractory materials not covered under the definition of 'capital goods' – Held that:- Tribunal held that after the amendment of... ...

2011 (4) TMI 1235 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Mohd Ismail Ahmed Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Whether purchase of tendu leaves by the appellants, who are registered exporters of tendu leaves in the State of Chhattisgarh, is inter-State or intra-State sale? - Held that:- We are in entire agreement with the reasonings of the learned single judges in holding the sale transaction of tendu leaves as intra-State sale, and not inter-State sale. We find no substance in this batch of writ appeals, the same deserve to be and are, accordingly, d... ...

2009 (9) TMI 911 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Steel Authority of India Limited Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Constitutional validity of Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 to declare the Entry Tax (Amendment) Act, 2001, whereby maximum limit of tax imposable under section 4A has been enhanced from 10 per cent to 50 per cent, as also notification issued under section 3(2), 4A under section 10 of the Act of 1976 from time to time challenged - Held that:- The constitutional validity of the Act of 1976 has been upheld... ...

2008 (12) TMI 188 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

IN RE : AES CHATTISGARH ENERGY PVT. LTD.

The applicant states that it proposes to set up a “1200 MW green field integrated coal fired power plant” which would include (a) captive coal mine, (b) dedicated coal transportation facility and © dedicated water intake and pumping system and (d) dedicated power evacuation system. - the applicant will have to import appliances, equipments, machinery, coal mining equipment, control gear and transmission equipment and components. The applicant s... ...

2008 (5) TMI 638 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Versus State of M.P. and Ors.

W.P. Nos. 1581 of 2002, 1195 of 2003, 6361, 6362, 6364, 7055, 7649, 9827, 10389, 11642, 14026, 14698, 17586, 17896, 18018 and 18420 of 2006, 211, 960, 978, 1093, 1274, 2358, 2396, 3373, 3546, 3659, 4010, 4386, 4745, 4860, 4863, 4926, 4986, 4987, 4988, 4989, 4990, 4991, 4992, 4993, 5066, 5069, 5088, 5167, 5351, 5660, 5663, 5704, 5766, 5767, 5792, 5944, 7397, 7398, 7650, 7895, 7896, 7897, 7898, 8063... ...

2008 (2) TMI 883 - Itat Bilaspur

CHHATTISGARH STEEL CASTING (P) LTD. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

K. S. S. PRASAD RAO J.M. and JUGAL KISHORE A.M. R. S. Khemka & D. L. Goenka, for the Appellant. S. C. Baberia, for the Respondent. ORDER K.S.S. Prasad Rao, J.M. : These appeals are filed by the assessee and the Department having been aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT(A), Raipur dt. 3rd May, 2007 for the asst. yr. 2004-05 in the case of the assessee. Since both these appeals arise out o... ...

2003 (9) TMI 719 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Versus State of MP. and others (LPA. No. 578 of 2002) L & T Cement Club, Indore Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others (LPA. No. 325 of 2003)

DIPAK MISRA AND SHRIVASTAVA A.K. , JJ. The matter in question is covered by the decision of this Court in W.P. No. 1167 of 2002 (Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. State of M.P.) decided on August 20, 2002. 2 In this writ petition prayer is made by the petitioner that they are entitled to avail of the benefit of deferment of tax as per the eligibility certificate P7 issued by respondent No. 1 on Novembe.